Breaking News

Has Mercks Measles/Mumps MMR vaccine become ineffective, or have new strains emerged?

0 0

This is not a snippet on pro nor anti vaccination. It is an attempt to determine risk vs. benefit ratio of an administered medication English: Preparation of measles vaccine at the...

You have ( small cluster outbreaks ) emerging cases in the Philippines, British Columbia, New York, and California

You have a Mumps outbreak in Ohio among 111 a bulk at Ohio State University The rate of that had been vaccinated is currently unknown.

However it should only be Merck’s MMRII used nationwide.

The problem with this is the Mumps protection rate was fabricated through fraud, and never corrected:  Courthouse News Service Site 27 JUN 2011

PHILADELPHIA (CN) – Merck has known for a decade that its mumps vaccine is “far less effective” than it tells the government, and it falsified test results and sold millions of doses of “questionable efficacy,” flooding and monopolizing the market, a primary caregiver claims in a federal antitrust class action.

Alabama-based Chatom Primary Care sued Merck on Monday, the week after the unsealing of a False Claims Act complaint two relators filed in 2010. Those relators, Stephen Krahling and Joan Wlochowski, were Merck virologists who claim in their unsealed complaint that they “witnessed firsthand the improper testing and data falsification in which Merck engaged to artificially inflate the vaccine’s efficacy findings.”

Further Excerpt: ” Merck is the only manufacturer licensed by the FDA to sell the mumps vaccine in United States, and if it could not show that the vaccine was 95 percent effective, it risked losing its lucrative monopoly, according to the complaint.”

#2 I could only find 1 article mentioning the infection rate vs. the vaccinated and unvaccinated California public health officials say 19 of the 32 cases of measles they have confirmed so far this year are in people who had not been vaccinated, and of that group, 14 were intentionally not vaccinated. ( Source )

This most likely  would yield far less than a 95 to 99% protection rate based on available date ( 19 unvaccinated to 13 vaccinated ). Since we do not know if the 19 unvaccinated were immunocompromised or under 9 months of age… I would like to see more comparable data as it becomes available….

I am slightly suspicious of the timing, since the ” The International Medical Council on Vaccination ” just issued a highly critical report on the Measles Vaccine found here:  Measles Vaccines Part I; Ineffectiveness of Vaccination and Unintended Consequences. ~ by Dr Viera Scheibner (PhD) – As more data is released on what and whom is infected, I will try an update…

Just try to look at the Numbers and not Propaganda from one side, or the other…  Medicine is Medicine (Some good, Some Not so Good)

About Post Author

Ralph Turchiano

I have a strong affinity for the sciences which led me to create my sites. My compulsion for the past decade has been reviewing literally every peer-reviewed research article. Which can easily be validated by following my posts. To me, science is where the real news is, as it will mold our destiny beyond that of politics or economics. 😉 Please feel free to e-mail: 161803p314159@gmail.com
Happy
Happy
0 %
Sad
Sad
0 %
Excited
Excited
0 %
Sleppy
Sleppy
0 %
Angry
Angry
0 %
Surprise
Surprise
0 %

Average Rating

5 Star
0%
4 Star
0%
3 Star
0%
2 Star
0%
1 Star
0%
%d bloggers like this: