The resulting waste water is highly radioactive and contains high levels of heavy metals and salts called halides (bromide, chloride and iodide)
Concerns that fluids from hydraulic fracturing, or “fracking,” are contaminating drinking water abound. Now, scientists are bringing to light another angle that adds to the controversy. A new study, appearing in the ACS journal Environmental Science & Technology, has found that discharge of fracking wastewaters to rivers, even after passage through wastewater treatment plants, could be putting the drinking water supplies of downstream cities at risk.
William A. Mitch, Avner Vengosh and colleagues point out that the disposal of fracking wastewater poses a major challenge for the companies that use the technique, which involves injecting millions of gallons of fluids into shale rock formations to release oil and gas. The resulting wastewater is highly radioactive and contains high levels of heavy metals and salts called halides (bromide, chloride and iodide). One approach to dealing with this wastewater is to treat it in municipal or commercial treatment plants and then release it into rivers and other surface waters. The problem is these plants don’t do a good job at removing halides. Researchers have raised concern that halide-contaminated surface water subsequently treated for drinking purposes with conventional methods, such as chlorination or ozonation, could lead to the formation of toxic byproducts. Mitch’s team set out to see if that was indeed the case.
The researchers diluted river-water samples of fracking wastewater discharged from operations in Pennsylvania and Arkansas, simulating real-world conditions when wastewater gets into the environment. In the lab, they then used current drinking-water disinfection methods on the samples. They found that even at concentrations as low as 0.01 percent up to 0.1 percent by volume of fracking wastewater, an array of toxic compounds formed. Based on their findings, the researchers recommend either that fracking wastewater should not be discharged at all into surface waters or that future water treatment include specific halide-removal techniques.
The authors acknowledge funding from the National Science Foundation.
The American Chemical Society is a nonprofit organization chartered by the U.S. Congress. With more than 161,000 members, ACS is the world’s largest scientific society and a global leader in providing access to chemistry-related research through its multiple databases, peer-reviewed journals and scientific conferences. Its main offices are in Washington, D.C., and Columbus, Ohio.
To automatically receive news releases from the American Chemical Society, contact firstname.lastname@example.org.
Follow us: Twitter Facebook
- ‘Fracking’ wastewater that is treated for drinking produces potentially harmful compounds (esciencenews.com)
- ‘Fracking’ wastewater that is treated for drinking produces potentially harmful compounds (scienceblog.com)
- Scientists: Fracking Wastewater Poses Threat To Drinking Water (thinkprogress.org)
- ‘Fracking’ wastewater that is treated for drinking produces potentially harmful compounds (phys.org)
- Treating fracking wastewater results in new unsafe compounds (upi.com)
- ‘Fracking’ wastewater that is treated for drinking produces potentially harmful compounds (eurekalert.org)
- ‘Fracking’ wastewater that is treated for drinking downstream produces potentially harmful compounds (sciencedaily.com)
- Environmental costs, health risks, and benefits of fracking examined (sciencedaily.com)
- Fracking wastewater contaminated – and radioactive (nbcnews.com)