For the very non scientific claims of Vitamin D lacking evidence, as posted in other publications like the Mail onlie:

Vitamin D supplements ‘don’t ward off ill health’: Little evidence pills lower risk of cancer, strokes or other conditions

Here are small snipets of data to unhinge experimenter bias and media misconceptions:

MS reversed in mice / Single dose  ( Calcitriol ) Vitamin D followed by Vitamin D supplements

Vitamin D reduces blood pressure and relieves depression in women with diabetes

Vitamin D supplementation may delay precocious puberty in girls

Vitamin D deficiency may help spread of hepatitis B throughout liver

Preterm infants may need 800 IU of vitamin D3 per day

Sunshine hormone, vitamin D, may offer hope for treating liver fibrosis

Vitamin D may reduce risk of uterine fibroids, according to NIH study

Vitamin D proven to boost energy — from within the cells

Experts find link between low doses of vitamin D and adverse pregnancy outcomes

Vitamin D benefits breathing in tuberculosis patients

Study reveals potential immune benefits of vitamin D supplements in healthy individuals

Vitamin D, omega-3 may help clear amyloid plaques found in Alzheimer’s

Low vitamin D levels may increase risk of Type 1 diabetes: Up to 50%

Vitamin D Holds Promise in Battling a Deadly Breast Cancer, SLU Researchers Say

New review associates vitamin D with lower rates of tooth decay

Researchers recommend pregnant women take 4,000 IU vitamin D a day

Vitamin D, may protect us from background radiation and could be used as a safe protective agent before or after a low-level nuclear incident

Gestational exposure to urban air pollution linked to vitamin D deficiency in newborns

Could vitamin D, a key milk nutrient, affect how you age?

Vitamin D deficiency: Common and problematic yet preventable

* Alright I can’t post all the research titles over the past 7  years, since just the titles alone are over 35 pages…. You are welcome to search for far more 😉

Sincerely,

Ralph Tutchiano

Ralph Turchiano

By Ralph Turchiano

I have a strong affinity for the sciences which led me to create my sites. My compulsion for the past decade has been reviewing literally every peer-reviewed research article. Which can easily be validated by following my posts. To me, science is where the real news is, as it will mold our destiny beyond that of politics or economics. ;-)

3 thoughts on “The Counter to the Lancet Claims Vitamin D has little Efficay – Well the Lancet is mistaken ( Here, try some Science )”
  1. […] as a medical journal. Please refer to the first rebuttal to the lancet back in December : The Counter to the Lancet Claims Vitamin D has little Efficay – Well the Lancet is mistaken ( Her… This is the Lancets second go at Vitamin D, and its last scrap of […]

  2. I live in New York and the winter time is really tough as it is so cold and cloudy. A lot of the time I do not even go out and I can tell that the lack of Vitamin D really affects my mood and energy as I feel lazy and unhappy. Lacking a tan really sucks too!

    1. Well, I’m brown year round naturally and must tell you that by January, not only do I have cabin fever that no amount of sun shining through my Brooklyn apartment window can diminish (because there is none), I am Vitamin D deficient through late spring. The northeast does that to you,

Leave a Reply

Discover more from CLINICALNEWS.ORG

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading